Sell the Iran Peace News as Rallies Have Been Exhausted

By all accounts, we have a peace deal.

What the deal actually is, as of the time that I’m writing this, is unclear.

I keep coming back to what Academy’s Geopolitical Intelligence Group says: Iran has never won a war, and never lost a negotiation. Given how keen we seemed on getting a “deal” and how reluctant we seemed to be to risk American lives (admirable, but tricky in a conflict), I’m skeptical about the longer term prospects for a deal. But that is for another day.

In the meantime, how much more can the market rally on the “same” news? Sure, maybe this is more certain, but we have been busy rallying on similar headlines and ignoring how entrenched “higher for longer is on oil.” As of Sunday night, the January 2027 WTI contract is hovering close to $75. This was $55 before the conflict started. Those in the energy industry have been telling us about problems with diesel, chemicals, etc. Especially from Asia. Were they alarmist? Or, now that details of the “deal” are likely to come out, should we pay more attention to them?

My expectation is that the lows on bond yields and the highs on equities will dissipate as the trading day progresses — sell the “news” (or what passes for news these days).

Space

I have not bought ($SPCX) yet. I did try and participate in the IPO but, as a registered rep, my compliance department said no (we cannot participate in “hot” deals even if our firm is not involved).

I almost put in an order at $155, but missed the chance (long story, but work travel and trading do not go well together). In any case, I will be buying SPCX sometime in the next days or weeks.

I am not sure about valuation. I am convinced that government spending on space, particularly form a national security standpoint, will increase.

Honestly, I like the clause about 1 million people on Mars! I keep thinking, “space the now frontier (I did listen to the various voiceovers of “space, the final frontier” and still get chills.

AI

I see two distinct threats to AI.

The first threat, that I’m only worried about at the margin, is:

As costs increase and we move beyond the replacing of search (where AI has clearly won), will cost-benefit analysis support the current rate of spend on AI? I’m only worried about this at the margin.

The second threat, which is avoidable but seems like a realistic path, is political backlash against AI:

  • The fear of the threat of job losses is real
  • The fear of the inability to get hired as a junior is real
  • Add in robotics and the fear of potential job losses grow
  • Rising electricity prices, among other complaints surrounding data center build out, is real in many parts of the country.

The need for data centers and AI for national security is more real and more clearly defined.

But I do think the industry needs to do a better job of explaining the benefits or there is a risk of a political backlash.

That is unlikely to materialize as the IPOs occur, but something to be thinking about.

Bottom Line

Look for bond yields, globally, to drift higher.

Stocks will be far more dependent on the success of AI IPOs, the ongoing spend, and how SPCX performs in the coming days, than they are on the Iran deal.

I’m indifferent and confused, so am playing it close to home.

In the meantime, I’m adding to companies that will benefit from other countries and regions realizing production for security (ProSec) is going global.

Avatar photo

Posted by Peter Tchir

Peter Tchir started his career at Bankers Trust and later at Deutsche Bank, running high-yield derivatives. He has traded all manner of fixed-income products, both on the sell side as a market maker and as a portfolio manager at a fixed-income hedge fund. During the financial crisis he ran the U.S. CDS-index business (made famous by The Big Short) for RBS. He was an early adopter of fixed income ETFs and has worked closely with the biggest traders, users and providers. Tchir received B.S. in mathematics and computer sciences from the University of Waterloo and an MBA with distinction from Vanderbilt University, where he also won the Matt Wiggington Leadership Award for outstanding performance in finance. Tchir describes his investing style as contrarian by nature and uses macroeconomic analysis to think about the next 3% to 5% move in the S&P 500, often a timeframe of weeks to months rather than years. When he’s not thinking about market movements (it’s rare!), you can find him applying his competitive spirit on the golf course.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *