Hi Ho Silver!
Position: None
Position: None
* Mama mia, mama mia!
* Carry on, carry on as if nothing really matters…
Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy?
Caught in a landslide, no escape from reality
Open your eyes, look up to the skies and see
I’m just a poor boy, I need no sympathy
Because I’m easy come, easy go
Little high, little low
Any way the wind blows doesn’t really matter to me, to me
– Queen, Bohemian Rhapsody
Inflation rising and interest rates higher, breadth with a foul odor, equal-weighted S&P underperforming the S&P Index, etc etc:

Sometimes I wish I never shorted at all…
Note: I will be traveling tomorrow! You will be in the capable hands of Chris Versace.
See you back on Friday morning!!!
Position: None
I moved up to small sized short the indices:
* $SPY $743.72
* $QQQ $716.37
Position: Short SPY (S), QQQ (S)
At 1:54 PM:
Breadth

S&P 500 Sector ETFs

Nasdaq 100 Heat Map

S&P Index ($SPY) +0.61%.
Equal Weighted S&P Index ($RSP) -0.45%.
While the market’s breadth is stinking up the joint:

Position: Short SPY (VS)
I call more B.S.:
Position: None
This is Part 5 of a multi-part discussion of the markets (Read Part 1 here, Part 2 here, Part 3 here and Part 4 here) …
Now, let’s wrap it up…
“It is always well to accept your own shortcomings with candor but to regard those of your friends with polite incredulity.”
– Russell Lynes
As noted in a previous post It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad Investment World.
Today’s commentary shares my views and tries to attach empirical evidence and observations that support a skeptical market outlook.
I continue to be reminded of Warren Buffett’s quote:
“What the wise do in the beginning, fools do in the end.”
With the same intended message, Barton Biggs was more colorful when he said:
“A bull market is like sex. It feels best just before it ends.”
Citigroup’s CEO Charles Prince — in July 2007, only months before The Great Financial Crisis (and historic market decline) — had a different view (as reported in an interview he had with The Financial Times):
“When the music stops, in terms of liquidity, things will be complicated. But as long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance. We’re still dancing.”
That said, with the S&P 500 making an all-time record in May — and despite my protestations — it is abundantly clear that, for now, neither the markets nor most market participants (human and machine) share my outlier, non-consensus and ursine outlook.
Market participants are still at the bacchanal — while I remain celibate.
Position: None
This is Part 3 of a multi-part discussion of the markets (Read Part 1 here, Part 2 here and Part 3 here) …
We are mindful of the gap between Wall Street and Main Street:


As an illustration of the Main Street/Wall Street comparison, here is the stock price chart of Home Depot ($HD):

With inflation high and the economy weakening, should equities decline, the weakness in the K-shaped economy could begin to impact the middle and upper-middle classes —adversely impacting aggregate economic growth.
As mentioned, the stock market is now acting less like a church (which respects valuations) and more like a casino.
Last Thursday the market did something it has literally never done before. The S&P traded $2.6 trillion in call options — that is the highest single day call volume in market history:

When traders buy massive amounts of calls the market makers selling those calls are forced to hedge by buying the underlying stocks. That buying pushes prices higher. Higher prices force more hedging. More hedging pushes prices higher again. This is called a gamma squeeze. It works well on the way up. It’s brutal on the way down.
The entire market is in an unprecedented gamma squeeze. Open interest at all-time high, outstanding delta above $4.2 trillion — an all-time high:

In the context of this speculation, I plan to continue to have some net short exposure. However, given the respect I have for the historical conditions of late speculative cycle markets (they go further than anyone expects!) and the forceful impact of passive strategies and products (driven by algorithms), I will, consistent with my risk appetite, keep my net short exposure low.
Nonetheless, there will come a time that I will expand my short book.
Stay tuned for Part 5…
This is Part 3 of a multi-part discussion of the markets (Read Part 1 here and Part 2 here)…
In my view, the markets have ignored the same conditions that set off the January-February selloff. None of the non-war issues that drove stocks lower have been resolved:
* Oil prices are off their highs but are likely to remain elevated because of the magnitude of the supply shock and continued uncertainties related to the Iran conflict.
* Inflation is now rising on a sequential monthly basis — and is higher than before the conflict in Iran.
* Interest rates will be higher for longer.
* The 2026 annual deficit will approach $2 trillion, and neither political party show any signs of being fiscally responsible.
* The U.S. debt will hit $40 trillion this year — the cost of servicing the debt is over $1 trillion/year.
* With a burgeoning deficit, stiff debt load and persistent inflation, the Fed’s hands are tied.
* While private equity’s problems are not systemic, the leverage they brought us remains in place. KKR Private-Credit Fund Takes $560 Million Loss – WSJ
* The enormous amount of money spent on AI will probably never see an adequate return on investment. As noted by Stan Druckenmiller (again!), AI’s societal and transformative impact could rival the internet’s life-changing influence — and so may the stock market consequences (rhyme) be similar:
“If we were all sitting here in 1999 talking about the Internet, I don’t think anybody would have estimated it would be as big as it got in 20 years. And yet, if you bought the Nasdaq in ’99, it went down 80% before that all came to fruition. That’s not going to happen with AI. But it could rhyme – AI could rhyme with the Internet as we go through all this capital spending we need to do. The big payoff might be four to five years from now. So AI might be a little overhyped now but under-hyped long term.”
* Valuations are a terrible clock but a good weather forecast. That valuations are stretched is an understatement. See CAPE Shiller in Part 2. The Buffett ratio (the total market capitalization divided by GDP) hit an all-time high this week). Most other traditional metrics indicate that equity valuations are in the 97 percentile.
* Many bulls highlight the improving strength in projected 2026 S&P EPS. They argue that this year’s robust growth in profits (at about +17%) justify current valuations. However, if one takes out Nvidia ($NVDA) and Micron ($MU), 2026 S&P EPS growth falls to under +10%:


Almost no tech stock, not even the bombed-out software stocks, are inexpensive when held to strict accounting standards, more strict and more forensic in nature than GAAP.
Michael Burry hits the target in his recent commentary:
The NASDAQ 100’s true PE is closer to 43x than the 30x Wall Street tells us.

In addition to the effects of stock-based compensation, previously discussed problems with depreciation policies, construction-in-progress, M&A costs, capital leases, and other necessary adjustments to GAAP net income to find true owners’ earnings.
Including all these adjustments, Wall Street may be overstating by more than 50% the earnings at our fastest growing, most highly valued companies.
In addition, there is the likelihood of future write-downs, in large measure stemming from the numerous circular financings. (Cisco in 2021 and 2002 wrote down years of its best earnings when it had to write off the same types of contracts with its suppliers).

Most investors are now convinced we are in a continued bull market led by AI-related equities.
However, the anatomy of a bear market (we will not know until after the fact!) is that there are violent rallies.
As noted earlier, a classic and extreme example was when the Nasdaq declined by -81% (2000-2002) following the dot-com boom in which the revolutionary impact of the internet was heralded and applauded in the indexes.
Along the way to the nearly 80% drop, there were five robust rallies of between +12% and +45%. The average gain in the rallies was +33%.
Every rally felt like a bottom, but every rally was a trap:

I see multiple traps ahead, including financing circularity and quality of earnings (the other income line has been aided by sizeable increases in private investment valuation marks – below), among other issues (like the large erosion in hyperscaler free cash flow):

Stay tuned for Part 4…